2Hr Aquarist APT E Estimative Index
With the 2HR Aquarist APT-EI, the famous nutrient dosing approach pioneered by Tom Barr is now available in a ready-to-use concentrate that removes the guesswork from trying to recreate this powerful and sometimes elusive formula.
APT e is perfect for heavily planted Dutch Style tanks and users who understand EI methodology. Supremely concentrated and expertly balanced.
Dose 5ml per 100L 3 times per week or 2ml per 100L daily
Our signature Standard Pack comes with a calibrated pump.
300ml. Lasts ~3mths for a 40 Gal / 150L tank.
Analysis of the Estimative Index (EI) nutrient dosing approach
EI aims to dose all nutrients in excess through heavily dousing the water column with nutrients. Levels are normalised at the end of each week with large (50%) water changes. The aim is to provide plants with non-limiting amounts of nutrients.
The EI philosophy in simplified form is as follows: Fundamentally, it is difficult to gauge with precision the exact uptake rates in a tank for any particular nutrient. This is especially so when the tank has different types of plants and other growth parameters involved (light/CO2). However, dosing everything "in excess" removes any possible nutrient deficiency from the analysis (we assume plants are getting all the nutrients they require through the plentiful amount in the water column) and allows the aquarist to focus on tweaking the other growth variables: light, CO2 levels (this is usually the hardest thing to get right), and other water parameters.
But what about algae? EI theory is based on the idea that if plant growth is taken cared of, plant mass will out-compete algae. It says that algae presence is not determined by whether nutrients are available or not, but rather whether or not there is sufficient plant mass to compete algae (not only in terms of nutrients, but space, light). Healthy plants are the best defense against algae. This is covered more in the portion about diagnosing algae issues.
A weekly cumulative dose of nutrients according to EI would be around:
NO3 - up to 20 - 30ppm
PO4 - up to 5 - 7ppm
K - up to 20 - 30ppm
Fe/traces - up to 0.5 - 1ppm
Divide the above by number of days dosing is done to get a daily dosing rate. Some people use higher/lower levels compared to the usual recommendations, and many tanks are flexible enough that things work in a large range.
Tom Barr's tanks (such as the one above) are often used as the marketing face for EI. However, his success is more closely tied to good maintenance, quality of lighting and upkeep than on the actual nutrient ratios used, but people tend to get caught up with the nutrient angle. Tom Barr campaigns strongly for the idea that high levels of nutrients in the water column do not cause algae issues - if plant mass was dominant & healthy in the tank.
The rich red colors of many 'Dutch style' tanks are largely the impact of lighting - and not because of particularly heavy nutrient dosing into the water column, a concept that many beginners are mistaken on. Indeed, certain plant species such as Rotala rotundifolia & Ludwigia arcuata/brevipes are significantly redder when grown under a lean dosing regime rather than EI.
SUMMARY OF PROS AND CONS
- Fast growth, faster propagation, tanks fill in much faster.
- Plants that do well with heavy water column dosing will grow more robust, thicker.
- Plants that access nutrients from water column do not have to wait for root growth to develop, this reduces growth lag time between replanting cycles for certain plants.
- Deficiencies are easy to rule out, making it easier to focus on tuning CO2, light and other factors.
- Makes tank less dependent on substrate & substrate enrichment.
- Fast growth will require more trimming.
- Due to increased growth rates, tanks tend to look unkempt unless trimmed and managed frequently. This generally means increased maintenance work.
- Plants that are sensitive to heavy water column dosing may get stunted tips (more so in hardwater tanks); applies to various Rotala , Ammania species, Pogostemon erectus.
- Plants that require low nitrates to get red (Rotala rotundifolia/H'ra/Colorata, Ludwigia arcuata/brevipes etc) will be less red/more orange.
- Unless tank is stable, very clean, may exaggerate existing algae issues. High NO3 levels often exaggerate GDA (green dust algae) problems.
Should I use Estimative Index dosing?
Tanks that are suitable for EI dosing approach:
- If you have a very fully planted tank (>70% of substrate planted).
- Tank consists of plants that grow more robust in heavy water column fertilization; (i.e. Ludwigia pantanal & other heavy feeders).
- If you plan to farm plants and hence want faster growth rates.
- If you can keep up with the increased trimming/maintenance associated with faster growth rates.
- If you are rushing to complete a project, and need maximum growth speed.
- If you are good at tank maintenance and have a very clean tank with few triggers for algae.
Tanks that will probably do better on a leaner dosing approach:
- If you have a hardscape heavy setup with light planting.
- If your tank consists of mostly slow growers and your priority is to keep them spotlessly clean.
- If your priority is tank stability and you want slower more controlled growth speed in plants.
- If you have persistent green dust algae issues.
- Non-CO2 injected tanks.
- If you have hardwater and are facing tip stunting issues with Lythraceae (Various Ammania, Rotala species, Pogostemon erectus, etc).